:lol: ndroo, maybe you can ask KT to scan for you? mine also 90% good. usually~ if the results were bad....90% my fault for not exposing the shots properly~ maybe the CX2 battery dying?

Wah. Thanks for showing us the difference between the different films! Is there any similar thread to compare the price and result for processing labs? So far I only go KT and ask them to scan to CD.

thanks ian!! anyway, tim, if u have more info.. do add on. :D

no problem.. no problem.. 8)

the asa seting affect the result, somehow more drastically than normal films. elitechrome asa 100 at: lca asa 25 lca asa100 lca asa400 i was not trying to -*test*-('") the lca asa but the train platform was quite dark, so to be safe i took 3 shots.

100 at 100 the best! :D I tried that too just to -*test*-('") if the expired film needs to be stopped down. Got the same greenish tone when film was underexposed. :)

I'm wondering.. in Page 1 of this thread, the Sensia 100 pictures.. how do you get the blurry lantern in the field effect? If it's by holding onto the shutter longer, then won't the pictures be blurry? Hee.. newbie here.. please advise.. :D

More Fuji Sensia 100. For these pictures, they're set at LC-A ASA 100 or 50. After seeing patriach's lay out of the differences, I'm tempted to experiment too! All processed at Triple D The below was achieved with the Vivitar UWS where there is no manual control of ASA. sorry for the size>

=x wat's xpro