terrible first set
Film: Lucky 120 film Comments: Never using this film again... images not sharp and pretty dull/boring =( very disappointed. Anyways please comment so that others can learn from my experience (: #1 #2 #3 #4 underexposed #5 #6 severly under exposed #7 #8 #9

Lidat one ka? But I somehow like the 1st two leh!

image not sharp??? or u meant the contrast is not strong?

haha er both? like there's no oompf to the pictures leh. like so dull

hmm, then try ilford bnw films. Best bnw films, to me that is. like the first 2 shots!

haha thankss (: im starting to like the first one now haha. hmm second one seems ok, pretty old school feel maybe

i guess ur using holga rite? prolly it wasnt sunny and u still went on shooting.

hmm actually some of the shots were taken when the sun was out. only those that were underexposed then were taken during cloudy days =/

Camera?

What camera u use? What ur setting? Where you develop? What kind of developing chemical use? So far nobody complain, how come only you complain about this film.....curious :roll:

i guess you are using a holga? no matter what bnw film u are going to use. if u shoot it on a cloudy day/dark place its all gonna look the same due to underexposure.

like underexpose? am i right?

lucky film works great for me

i like how it came out dreamy rather then seen it done that. I LIKE DREAMY FILMS! *rushes off to buy lucky*

huh really. i saw a post and someone also said she/he did not like lucky film. Using Holga 120. Setting: All normal mode. Developed at Triple D.